Posts from March 2016.

A theme in this blog has been that looking at the US Supreme Court only through the usual lens of party politics is a distortive lens: i.e. the Blue-Red Goggles (“BRGs” for short). If we put those BRGs aside, we can see a creative judicial process at work involving, for now, eight justices who are more three-dimensionally, more realistically ...

What does the Constitution actually say about the Supreme Court nomination/appointment process? After all, that is the main question, now that a nomination is made.

What process most upholds the Constitution?

Not:  What process best serves a political party, or a President, or a Senator, or a candidate, or a nominee, or a future President. Those ...

Ideas of government matter in American history and recycle in different eras through different guises, styles and messengers. If we look past the obvious style/messenger/ personality differences between Silent Cal Coolidge and Non-Silent Donald Trump, we see some recycling going on. The Coolidge idea of democracy was summed up in his ...

The news that Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas recently broke his ten-plus year silence during oral argument is an unusual counterpoint to the current flood of Presidential-wanna-be speech. The Justice's self-restraint in speech, juxtaposed with the visual imagery of a silent and empty judicial chair next to him draped in black, conveys ...

Search this Blog

Media Contact

Key Authors

Recent Posts

Jump to Page

Necessary Cookies

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. You may disable these by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Analytical Cookies

Analytical cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.